1987 Audi 90 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Audi 90 would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1987 Audi 90. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1987 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 184 kg more than 1987 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Audi 90. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Audi 90 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 90 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1494 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |