1987 Austin Maestro vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Austin Maestro | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Maestro | Clio |
Year Released | 1987 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 43 L |