1987 BMW 316 vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,571 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1987 BMW 316. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1987 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 BMW 316 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1987 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Acty (139 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 BMW 316. (123 Nm). This means 2002 Honda Acty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1987 BMW 316 | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 316 | Acty |
Year Released | 1987 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1571 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |