1987 BMW 316 vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1987 BMW 316. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1987 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 BMW 316 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 BMW 316. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1987 BMW 316 | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1571 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |