1987 BMW 324 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 BMW 324. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 BMW 324 would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 BMW 324 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1987 BMW 324. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1987 BMW 324. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 445 kg more than 1987 BMW 324. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1987 BMW 324 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 BMW 324. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 BMW 324. (214 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 BMW 324. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1987 BMW 324 has manual transmission. 1987 BMW 324 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 BMW 324 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 324 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.9 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.9 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |
