1987 Buick Regal vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1987 Buick Regal is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1987 Buick Regal. (135 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1987 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1987 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 1958 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1958 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Buick Regal | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Buick | Talbot |
Model | Regal | T 26 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |