1987 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Volvo 240
To start off, 1987 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 240 (106 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 240 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | 240 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |