1987 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Buick Skyhawk (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Buick | MCC |
| Model | Skyhawk | Smart |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
