1987 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 666 kg more than 1987 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Skyhawk | CTS |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1746 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
