1987 Buick Skylark vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Buick Skylark (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 18 kg more than 1987 Buick Skylark.
Let's talk about torque, 1987 Buick Skylark (217 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1987 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Buick Skylark | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Skylark | Equator |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3260 mm |
