1987 Buick Skylark vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Buick Skylark (148 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Buick Skylark weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Buick Skylark (217 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1987 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Buick Skylark | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Buick | MCC |
Model | Skylark | Smart |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |