1987 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1972 Honda 1300
To start off, 1987 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1972 Honda 1300.
Because 1987 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Cadillac Brougham | 1972 Honda 1300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Brougham | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2200 mm |
