1987 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 666 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 1987 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Cadillac Brougham | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Brougham | 626 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2620 mm |
