1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 47 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2306 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
