1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 293 kg more than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cimarron | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1987 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |