1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1173 kg more than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Econoline |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |