1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (137 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 98 kg more than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Cimarron | Clio |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |