1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (139 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 376 kg more than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Cimarron | Orlando |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1836 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |