1987 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
