1987 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1987 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1987 Cadillac DeVille. (129 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1987 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 417 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Cadillac DeVille (271 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1987 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 6 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4087 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 100 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2730 mm |
