1987 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1965 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Mini MK I.
Because 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1987 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Mini MK I | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | MK I |
Year Released | 1987 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |