1987 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1990 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1990 Holden Apollo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1990 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Apollo.
Because 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1987 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Chevrolet Camaro | 1990 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | Apollo |
Year Released | 1987 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |