1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2003 Mazda Premacy
To start off, 2003 Mazda Premacy is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 Mazda Premacy.
Because 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2003 Mazda Premacy | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Premacy |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2840 mm |
