1987 Chrysler TC vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Chrysler TC. (298 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Chrysler TC | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
Model | TC | M25 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |