1987 Citroen AX vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1987 Citroen AX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1987 Citroen AX. (85 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1987 Citroen AX.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen AX. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Citroen AX | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | AX | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2430 mm |