1987 Citroen AX vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Citroen AX would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1987 Citroen AX. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1987 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 633 kg more than 1987 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen AX. (73 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Citroen AX | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | AX | 6 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 83.1 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 18.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 722 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |