1987 Citroen AX vs. 2009 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Citroen AX would be higher. At 2,290 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (256 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1987 Citroen AX. (48 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1987 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 870 kg more than 1987 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (258 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen AX. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Citroen AX | 2009 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Citroen | Saab |
Model | AX | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 708 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |