1987 Citroen C 15 vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1987 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1987 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S40 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Citroen C 15 | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C 15 | S40 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |