1987 Citroen CX vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1987 Citroen CX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Citroen CX (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Citroen CX (177 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1987 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Citroen CX | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | CX | 140 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2620 mm |
