1987 Citroen CX vs. 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Citroen CX (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+. (89 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ weights approximately 245 kg more than 1987 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ (171 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Citroen CX | 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | CX | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 1987 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 171 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 41 L |