1987 Daihatsu Rocky vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Daihatsu Rocky. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Daihatsu Rocky would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1987 Daihatsu Rocky. (72 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1987 Daihatsu Rocky. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Daihatsu Rocky weights approximately 262 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 1987 Daihatsu Rocky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Daihatsu Rocky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Daihatsu Rocky. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Daihatsu Rocky.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Daihatsu Rocky | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Rocky | Artic |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2765 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |
