1987 Dodge Colt vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1987 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1987 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 14 kg more than 1987 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Dodge Colt | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Dodge | Fiat |
| Model | Colt | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2430 mm |
