1987 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Dodge Colt (87 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Dodge Colt weights approximately 180 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Dodge Colt (146 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1987 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Dodge Colt | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Colt | Smart |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |