1987 Dodge Lancer vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1987 Dodge Lancer. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1987 Dodge Lancer.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1987 Dodge Lancer 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Dodge Ford
Model Lancer Mustang
Year Released 1987 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2212 cc 4995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 97 HP 435 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 7000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1860 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]