1987 Dodge Lancer vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Dodge Lancer (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Dodge Lancer | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Lancer | Smart |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |