1987 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Fiat Ritmo | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Ritmo | Smart |
Year Released | 1987 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |