1987 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1987 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1987 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Fiat Ritmo | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Ritmo | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |
