1987 Ford Aerostar vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Combo (89 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1987 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Aerostar (160 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 1987 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Aerostar | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Aerostar | Combo |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 80.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2720 mm |