1987 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1987 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Falcon.
Because 1987 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Falcon (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Falcon | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | MX |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |