1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1987 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1987 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Ranger | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Taurus |
Year Released | 1987 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |