1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,971 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero (175 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Ranger | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Pajero |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |