1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2004 Seat Arosa is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Seat Arosa. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Arosa.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Seat Arosa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Ranger | 2004 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | Arosa |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |