1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (139 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Ranger | 2006 Honda Civic | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Civic |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4780 mm |