1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1987 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1987 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Ranger | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 3 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1755 mm |