1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1987 Ford RS 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (212 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 118 kg more than 1987 Ford RS 200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | RS 200 | Tempest |
Year Released | 1987 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 5341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2930 mm |