1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham
To start off, 1987 Ford RS 200 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1987 Ford RS 200. (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford RS 200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford RS 200. (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 1967 Mercury Brougham | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | RS 200 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1987 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 627 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3130 mm |