1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 1984 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1987 Ford RS 200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 326 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 1984 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | RS 200 | XJR |
Year Released | 1987 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 90 L |