1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1996 Subaru Outback. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Subaru Outback. (221 Nm). This means 1987 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | RS 200 | Outback |
Year Released | 1987 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.7 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |