1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1987 Ford RS 200. (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford RS 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1987 Ford RS 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford RS 200. (292 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | RS 200 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 475 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 132 L |