1987 Ford RS 200 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1987 Ford RS 200. (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford RS 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 524 kg more than 1987 Ford RS 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford RS 200. (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford RS 200 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | RS 200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 68 L |